The first two were right calls , because the defenders were still in motion if the defenders had stopped and stabled themselves then it would have been a charge by the offensive player
You don’t have to be not moving too take a charge. You can be moving and defending and still take the charge. That’s why there’s a difference between legal guarding positions and non legal.
White 8 (1:10 ) still in motion and haven’t took a standing defensive position and is still going back , ( 2:13 )look carefully at red 7’s feet they are still in motion going back with the incoming white 15 .
No expert myself but in the video it looks like the defender was moving into the attacker's current trajectory and is late (very important point); a legal movement would be legal containment instead of illegal body interception, or setting a charge beforehand. This scenario was mainly about who got there first.
If the defender is backing up when u dribble with your back to the basket, slowly getting forward, would it be a charging foul or would it not be called as the defender is moving
If a defender has legal guarding position, he or she may move backwards or laterally while maintaining legal guarding position. A post offensive player may back his opponent down as long as they don't impede on their defender's ability to play defense (i.e. shoving them so that they fall or they are backed up too far)
That is called a post play. There is going to be some resistance from both players (Defensive player trying to keep his position and offensive player trying to get closer to the basket) and as long as they are both resisting and respecting each others positions - then it shouldn't be any foul. However it is a foul by an offensive player or defensive player to shoulder or hip his opponent out of position.
Anyone watching this video who thinks anything that this man has just said is wrong does not understand FIBA basketball rules. This is a very good educational video.
I could only stand to watch the first few scenarios of this video. At least in the beginning the officials were CORRECT in their calls as the defenders did not have their feet set and are moving into the way of the offense as they drive
FIBA set the rules, but almost every league around the world makes slight changes to suit their style. It makes it hard to referee games between multiple leagues
Waiitt a minute. If the purpose of defending & blocking is to impede your opponent's progress towards the ring, then why at 8:20 is called a foul. Damn man, those rules make basketball soft. Not good. Not good.
Fantastic vid, I struggle differentiating and this helps huge!!
What a very GREAT video, thanks a lot💪🏻🏀
The first two were right calls , because the defenders were still in motion if the defenders had stopped and stabled themselves then it would have been a charge by the offensive player
You don’t have to be not moving too take a charge. You can be moving and defending and still take the charge. That’s why there’s a difference between legal guarding positions and non legal.
White 8 (1:10 ) still in motion and haven’t took a standing defensive position and is still going back , ( 2:13 )look carefully at red 7’s feet they are still in motion going back with the incoming white 15 .
If anything, I think the play at 5:40 isn't a charge, but a push or illegal elbow. Still an offensive foul, but not really a charging call.
First situation If it isn't clear that Red used the left arm to push White away, then it's a block.
Can these still be applied in 2022 FIBA rules?
On 9:14, did the defender actually move towards to the offensive player? In my opinion, the defender moved laterally thus the movement was legal.
No expert myself but in the video it looks like the defender was moving into the attacker's current trajectory and is late (very important point); a legal movement would be legal containment instead of illegal body interception, or setting a charge beforehand. This scenario was mainly about who got there first.
If the defender is backing up when u dribble with your back to the basket, slowly getting forward, would it be a charging foul or would it not be called as the defender is moving
If a defender has legal guarding position, he or she may move backwards or laterally while maintaining legal guarding position. A post offensive player may back his opponent down as long as they don't impede on their defender's ability to play defense (i.e. shoving them so that they fall or they are backed up too far)
That is called a post play. There is going to be some resistance from both players (Defensive player trying to keep his position and offensive player trying to get closer to the basket) and as long as they are both resisting and respecting each others positions - then it shouldn't be any foul. However it is a foul by an offensive player or defensive player to shoulder or hip his opponent out of position.
The comments prove how many different opinions on refereeing there are
This video helps a lot
@HoopZ why?
Michael Ryan it’s a bad video
Discbands Alternate Possession Wristband is a new & helpful accessory for officials. Be professional. Be right.
I have a question regarding the scene on 8:17. It should be legal defense, weren't it for the use of white's right forearm, wouldn't it?
contact occurs on right should, right arm and left arm, almost no contact on the torso => No legal defence
Anyone watching this video who thinks anything that this man has just said is wrong does not understand FIBA basketball rules. This is a very good educational video.
what is he calling restricted area?
I could only stand to watch the first few scenarios of this video. At least in the beginning the officials were CORRECT in their calls as the defenders did not have their feet set and are moving into the way of the offense as they drive
nba rule and international rule are different?
FIBA set the rules, but almost every league around the world makes slight changes to suit their style. It makes it hard to referee games between multiple leagues
hang on like is there no restricted area?
Deyon Grant Back in 2004, there wasn't.
90
Had to stop watchin this video after the first clip. Jus WRONG
what I understood from the video - referees on olympic games are dorks )))))
Waiitt a minute. If the purpose of defending & blocking is to impede your opponent's progress towards the ring, then why at 8:20 is called a foul. Damn man, those rules make basketball soft. Not good. Not good.